<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Walk Around Lens</title>
	<link>http://www.chromaticus.net/blog/2006/03/20/walkaround-lens/</link>
	<description>The written part of the Chromaticus photoblog.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 19:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Chromaticus</title>
		<link>http://www.chromaticus.net/blog/2006/03/20/walkaround-lens/#comment-15027</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 08:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chromaticus.net/blog/2006/03/20/walkaround-lens/#comment-15027</guid>
					<description>[...] A lot has happened in the little more than a year since I wrote this post about choosing a walk around lens. For one, I ended up spending the money I was accumulating for a lens on other hobbies. Secondly, I sort of got busy and distracted and dropped the daily photo blogging. My last photo was posted in October of 2006 (and July before that). In spite of this, I have learned a lot more about photography and equipment. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] A lot has happened in the little more than a year since I wrote this post about choosing a walk around lens. For one, I ended up spending the money I was accumulating for a lens on other hobbies. Secondly, I sort of got busy and distracted and dropped the daily photo blogging. My last photo was posted in October of 2006 (and July before that). In spite of this, I have learned a lot more about photography and equipment. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mick</title>
		<link>http://www.chromaticus.net/blog/2006/03/20/walkaround-lens/#comment-330</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 04:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chromaticus.net/blog/2006/03/20/walkaround-lens/#comment-330</guid>
					<description>Try looking at the Canon 28-105 f/3.5-4.5 - only around $250 and excellent quality.  It's an older lens, so it's often overlooked.  If you look at the reviews , you'll see it is VERY well respected</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try looking at the Canon 28-105 f/3.5-4.5 - only around $250 and excellent quality.  It&#8217;s an older lens, so it&#8217;s often overlooked.  If you look at the reviews , you&#8217;ll see it is VERY well respected
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

